[Previous] [Next] [Up] [Top]


Levels of Administrative Control



The premier administrative center, Cahokia.
A major characteristic of a chiefdom is two or three administrative levels. At the primary level (the chief's settlement, the mound center), are found those retainers and functionaries who carry out the chief's wishes and attend to his needs. Cahokia was clearly the primary administrative unit in the American Bottom complex chiefdom. These retainers and functionaries, usually the chief's close kin, then communicated his directives to minor chiefs and functionaries at smaller towns and villages. The second level of administrative control is found at these smaller mound-towns, such as Lunsford-Pulcher, Mitchell, East St. Louis and St. Louis, where the local leaders (relatives of the chief, or locally important leaders granted favors and status to acquiesce to the Cahokia elite) pass on the paramount chief's directives to the population under their authority and oversee their implementation.
These second and third level administrative units also serve as conduits for information and materials traveling back to chief. That is, socio-religious tribute and material obligations required by the chief are met by second and third line settlements through the actions of the local sub-chiefs' kin groups. Obligations and favors owed to this local elite, according to this view, are funneled up to higher ranking elites, and ultimately to the chief himself.

Kinship is critical to administrative control in a chiefdom. Typically, a chief's retainers, functionaries, and minor chiefs are close relatives. A chief's relatives have every incentive to cajole, strong-arm, bribe, or shame others to meet a chiefs directives because they directly benefit from his wealth and power. It is worth remembering, however, that family members often fight. Just like siblings and in-laws of family businesses may fight for control of the company at the death of the family patriarch or matriarch, chiefdoms were likely beset with internal competition among related administrators, each with their own host of backers (see chiefly competition also).

Archaeologically, levels of Mississippian administrative control in the American Bottom are measured by differences in the size, types of structures, and types of artifacts found in contemporaneous settlements (see above). The greater the sociopolitical and religious status and power that a particular settlement's elite had, the greater the size and number of mounds, other non-residential structures, prestige goods, etc. found at the settlement. Accordingly, Cahokia must have served as the primary administrative level while sites with multiple large mounds like Lunsford-Pulcer, Mitchell, East St. Louis and St. Louis were secondary administrative units under direction from the Cahokia elite. Smaller villages and hamlets fell into the direct administrative sphere of these lower administrative units. There is no disagreement that Cahokia was the premier site in an American Bottom complex chiefdom with multiple administrative levels. What is at issue, however, is the level of sociopolitical and religious integration and the level of power exercised by the Cahokia elite.


[Previous] [Next] [Up] [Top]