[Previous] [Next] [Up] [Top]


Politics from the Ground Up


Their pivotal role in social and religious functions offered local leaders the opportunity to siphon off some portion of tributes or ritualized payments for their own use. For other social obligations, the leaders may have extracted a payment for coordinating the ceremonies. In either case the wealthy households or corporate (kin) group are in a position to cultivate their own prestige, wealth, and stature.


Sweatlodges at Labras Lake site.





Initially such tributes may have been freely given, but later they may have become expected from commoners. Over time the entrenchment of prestigious people may have become more pronounced and the character of this movement of goods may have become more fixed. In either case the chief's power likely stemmed from both ritual threats and physical power of his loyal followers.
The most obvious archaeological expression of local chiefs' economic power (as well as social and religious power) are villages with one or two small mounds surrounded by a scattering of smaller settlements. Someone in the village was able to accumulate enough wealth and respect to organize the population and have the mounds built. Not all villages in the American Bottom contain mounds, but excavations have revealed the presence of civic or ceremonial buildings such as circular sweatlodges and pots, and ornaments more finely made than those found in surrounding hamlets. These so-called "nodal sites" appear to represent the economic integration of the local community of closely related households scattered in nearby hamlets. Although individual households in these scattered farmsteads were probably self-sufficient and largely autonomous, they no doubt had certain social obligations. Some of their family food surplus, for example, may have been required for local social and religious functions that they attended at the local leader's settlement (whose larger and more numerous sweatlodges could accomodate more people).

Similarly, some of the resources accumulated by these local chiefs must have been required for more inclusive ceremonies at larger mound centers. Stored foodstuffs, beads fashioned from shell, and other goods may have been transported by the lesser chiefs for social and religious events presided over by more powerful chiefs. Although simple, this socially mandated movement of goods and/or services from the hamlet - to nodal site - to small mound site - to large mound center is the basis of the chiefdom. It was the basis of integrating the American Bottom Mississippian economy.


Reconstructed sweatlodge, Cahokia Mounds Museum.


[Previous] [Next] [Up] [Top]